Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 6x7 negs have less dust?!!
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:15:15 +0800
References: <7ac27f4f0905311328l8217294w4109c29743f64091@mail.gmail.com>

You enlarge less for the same given print size, so the grain/dust  
isn't magnified as much to the final print?

On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Richard Man wrote:

> OK, I developed 2 rolls of 120 and 2 rolls of 220 already. My  
> development
> method is the same - XTol using a Jobo, sink water (too lazy to get
> distilled water) etc. but is it my imagination that the bigger negs  
> are
> cleaner? I don't think it's just the magnification factor issue. I  
> blow up
> the scan and the bigger negs just have less stuff on it?! Is my eyes
> deceiving me?!
>
>
> -- 
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // w: http://www.rfman.com
> // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

THEIN Onn Ming
*photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
www.flickr.com/mingthein







Replies: Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 6x7 negs have less dust?!!)
In reply to: Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 6x7 negs have less dust?!!)