Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 20:35:33 -0500 (CDT)
References: <16335985.1243644765140.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
 
Then why not make a camera where the AA filter can be slipped in or  
out of the lightpath?


On May 29, 2009, at 7:52 PM, Doug Herr wrote:

> Robert Meier wrote:
>
>> If the AA filter is so destructive of detail and picture quality, why
>> does everyone but Leica still use it?
>
> They're better for production photography (i.e., mass production)  
> where there's no time to fix the moire on an as-needed basis.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)