Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Ming Thein)
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 08:27:10 +0800
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E95C3@case-email.casefoods.com>
 
You still have to use sharpening all the time to get optimal acuity.  
You don't with the M8.

Thein Onn Ming
Sent from my iPhone

On May 30, 2009, at 0:39, "David Rodgers" <drodgers at casefarms.com>  
wrote:

> Thein,
>
>>> The D3x still has an AA filter, and while it has the best per- 
>>> pixel detail I've seen, it doesn't come close to the M8/DMR/CFV.  
>>> Those cameras have no AA filter.<<
>
> Could you please be moir? specific regarding "doesn't come close"?
>
> DaveR
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
 In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)