Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard,
IR whipping myself with that wet noodle right now. But very magentaly :-)
DaveR
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Man [mailto:richard.lists at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 3:03 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
Very simple:
Leica
- Nikon
------------
HUGE difference
for *any* definition of difference.
The only way a Nikon can match a Leica is if you cover the Nikon logo with a
piece of black tape and then draw a red logo on it, and call it a "Leica
D3X."
And David, whip yourself with a wet noodle for being so "moire" clever :-)
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, David Rodgers <drodgers at
casefarms.com>wrote:
> Thein,
>
> >>The D3x still has an AA filter, and while it has the best per-pixel
> detail I've seen, it doesn't come close to the M8/DMR/CFV. Those
> cameras have no AA filter.<<
>
> Could you please be moir? specific regarding "doesn't come close"?
>
> DaveR
>
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.rfman.com
// b: http://rfman.wordpress.com