Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I "don't know" either. I've attempted on many occasions to describe the difference between an M8 and 5D image file. The 5D has a "digital" and soft look (including when using leica glass). The M8 looks like a drum scan of slow film. I do not mean imply that the 5D cannot make beautiful photographs. It certainly can. I simply prefer the look of the M8 files - purely personal, subjective aesthetic considerations. I cannot comment on the RAW Nikon files - I've only looked a few from other's. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On May 22, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Thein Onn Ming wrote: > If only it were 16 bit, ACR may be able to recover another stop or > so from the highlight end) but very heavily biased towards the > highlights. It feels like MF digital. Maybe the kodak sensor? I > don't know.