Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yesterday I was walking along Seattle's Lake Union during lunch time. I spotted a female mallard duck standing at the door of a marine financial and brokerage firm, as if she wanted to get in. It would have made a great picture, just the kind that I like to take. Except that I didn't have a camera with me. Why? My employer now bans all personally-owned cameras in the workplace, including cell phone cameras. It's not negotiable. I would have to either leave my camera with the receptionist every day and pick it up at lunch and after work, or leave it in my car. I'm not comfortable with the first choice, as it makes a non-work activity impact the workplace (bad politics). And I certainly don't want to leave a Leica in either place. All this is a big PITA. So far I've just left my cameras at home, and I've missed a few good shots. Maybe I need another camera. One that I could leave in my car, and if it were stolen, it wouldn't be the end of the world. The question is, what camera? I'm thinking of either a fixed-lens rangefinder like a Canonet or an Olympus XA, or perhaps a decent secondhand digital. I hate autofocus lag on P&S cameras. And I'm not sure I want to deal with film again on a regular basis. I'd like the camera to be pocketable (or at least fit in a belt pouch). It should be focusable (no fixed-focus or guess-focus). Autoexposure is OK, but I'd prefer to have full manual shutter/aperture control available, and not so hard to use that I wouldn't use it. I want sufficient image quality that I wouldn't be embarrassed to show the pictures. I'd prefer a 40-50mm f/2 lens or thereabouts, as Seattle is often very gray. A final wrinkle--if I left the camera under a car seat, would it get too hot if I park outside during the summer? At work we have an indoor garage, but invariably the camera would sometimes get left in the car during errands, in the driveway at home, etc. Any thoughts? --Peter