[Leica] 8 or 8.2

[henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)]

Goes to show that personal preferences are what count. I'd pay maybe 
$5 more for an M8.2, figuring that the pluses of the 8.2 pretty much 
balance the lack of 1/8000sec.




At 6:07 PM -0500 5/1/09, David Keenan wrote:
>>Is there any REALLY good reason to pass on an M8 demo and
>>hold out for the 8.2?
>
>Ric --
>
>Good gawd yes.
>
>Unless you want to take advantage of the 1/2 price M8->M8.2 upgrade from
>Leica (for $1025) and order a better covering from CameraLeather or have
>Leica put one on for you.
>
>As many remember, I thought the M8 was a disaster. The M8.2 is what the M8
>should have been. It is really a splendid camera and so close to my M7s in
>operation that I often forget that I'm taking a digital picture.
>
>.
>Dave.
>
-- 

    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com