Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]RIGHT a real sports photographer who spends 23,635.17 dollars or ?16,000 on gear per year that's a fig Newton of someone's internet imagination. A sports photographer as in he's in the phonebook under photography and it says sports? or he's a software computer guy who gets paid for a shot a couple times a year so he can write off his gear. Or a real sports photographer who has a big expensive fast lens maybe and has up upgrade his DSLR once a year? Mark William Rabiner > From: Philip Clarke <nod at bouncing.org> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:06:03 +0100 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] G10 > > > There is two sides to every story (I'm talking about image quality). I > have a friend, he's a sport's photographer (international) and he spends > about ?16,000 a year on equipment (this was more before the British > pound collapsed). His theory which has been borne out by the awards he > received, was that he needed to best equipment *always* because if the > pictures passed over a pcture