Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] G10
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:15:29 +0200
References: <C61E2583.4D896%mark@rabinergroup.com>

G1 and M lens Mark - cool
Or N lens
or C lens
FD lens
 R lens
more on subscription
;-)
Ph

Mark Rabiner wrote:

>Its a bit big of a camera for such a small sensor size
>
>1/1.7" (approx 7.6x5.7) 4.67X
>
>Some comparisons:
>Full format (approx 36x24) - No crop factor or 1X
>Nikon DX (approx 23.6x15.5) 1.5X
>Canon (approx 22.7x15.1) 1.6X
>Olympus 4/3 (approx 18.0x13.5) 2X
>1/1.6" 4.44X
>1/1.7" (approx 7.6x5.7) 4.67X  (your 50mm lens becomes a 233mm lens)
>1/1.8" (approx 7.2x5.3) 4.83X
>1/2.5" (approx 5x4) 6.03X
>1/3" (approx 4.8x3.6) 7.0X
>
>
>Not SUPER 8 but slightly smaller I think than REGULAR 8 movie film.
>Around the size of Minox.
>Plenty of pocket digital cameras have sensors several size larger than this
>enabling shooting at better than film ISO's
>Not worse.
>
>To me its frustrating to go snap and think I got the picture but then
>realize I really didn't get the picture.
>I'd rather really get the picture.
>And use at least 4/3s size sensor.
>Perhaps use the Sigma Dp2.
>Its sleek, gorgeous, and has a sensor which is  20.7mm x 13.8mm.
>And comes crunchy smooth and creamy..
>
>http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08092305sigma_dp2.asp
>
>
>I'm still real pleased with carrying around my Nikon D40x with me in a
>little Domke side bag all day its been two years now I think with a small
>lens in front how much bigger is it than a point and shoot and how much more
>enabling?
>
>
>Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>  
>
>>From: Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com>
>>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:23:26 -0700
>>To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] G10
>>
>>If sensor size is important, many have larger ones than the G10. The
>>DMC G1 certainly provides better image quality than the G10 under any
>>conditions, and the Fuji F200EX also does better (I have the G10 and
>>tried out the F200EX in some quick tests). The G10 is not bad
>>considering the sensor size and 15mp, but it's not at the top of the
>>heap under lower lighting conditions. It probabably has somonee of
>>the highest pixel densities among the better P&S cameras.
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] G10)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] G10)