Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd like to pick one image, which I would call a "fantasy what if ?" commentary. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/belgiangator/aarhus/_B035051.jpg.html that you have captioned to include the sentence "This is not a particularly good photograph". This picture has elements that could make it a great photo with the addition of one element, a Ladder. Phillippe has a ladder (and uses it widely), so did I when I was active, and I think it is one of the most underated accessories. What I would suggest is getting in close to the "statue" on the wall and keeping the building in the rear to give it depth, but the picture clearly illustrates converging verticals so the camera can't be tilted backwards, but if the image is taken by the statue and the camera is levelled, one ends up with a bin in the picture and probably cutting the top of the building off. So one needs height and a ladder to get to an angle where when held level the statue is on the right of the frame and blocking the smaller building so one has a cleaner more interesting image to start with. The image would be left with very clean verticals from the windows (although in a true fantasy all the blinds would be open or shut. There's flower mural that would disrupt the eye at the bottom of the building, from the angle I've chosen (a few feet closer to the mural and 4 feet up), there's a sweeping curve that connects the wall of the mural to the tree and more depth caused by the reflection of the building in the pool. I'd have to be very careful not to include the older building above the statue so I may even have to move a few feet closer to the statue and choose to fill the entire right hand side of the picture with the wall. Now I realise that this is fiction and that a ladder may not have been available and a whole host of other things may not be possible, the top of the building has a grey metal framework and it'd be very tricky to find the exact angle that hides it, or the building may need to be cropped. There's a not very attractive drain pipe on the side so the other option is to loose the tree by swinging the camera over more to the right (from my fantasy position) and another option is ignoring the building entirely, getting up even higher, photographing the statue on the wall filling half the frame entirely and the other half being filled by the reflection of the building in the pool. If the water is still then it's a representative image, but throwing a stone into the pool breaks the image up into contrasting brick lines and wobbly windows. This is the way my mind works when I see any picture, even if the scene is lacklustre, I explore any option available including dragging the table to under my "ladder" position and standing on it. Philip. Nathan Wajsman wrote: > have lived and travelled in many countries during my adult life. But > one place will always be the most special place in the world for me, and > that place is ?rhus, where I grew up and which will always be my > hometown. Everywhere I go there are memories from my childhood and > youth, and more importantly, there are good friends to visit: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/belgiangator/aarhus/ > > I visit ?rhus twice a year and will be adding to the gallery after every > trip, next time probably in November. > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information