Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Children of the World
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:24:06 -0500
References: <E1LuQD4-0005nL-CB@elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <49E71EF7.6010708@bouncing.org> <49E72CD3.1080805@gmx.de> <49E732B5.6070205@bouncing.org>
 
Accurate to what?
Accurate to your point of view?

Tina was "there"
The photographs are perfectly accurate
to where she stood and what she pointed her camera at.

The fact that you believe she should have pointed her camera elsewhere
does not make her photographs inaccurate.

All photo journalism (and journalism) is subjective.

If you want objective photographs of planet earth
have a look at satellite images.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Apr 16, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Philip Clarke wrote:

> is the portrayal accurate ?
In reply to: Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (photo.forrest at earthlink.net) ([Leica] IMGS: Children of the World)
Message from nod at bouncing.org (Philip Clarke) ([Leica] IMGS: Children of the World)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMGS: Children of the World)
Message from nod at bouncing.org (Philip Clarke) ([Leica] IMGS: Children of the World)