Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steve I suspect that was bad judgement in this instance rather than necessarily policy. As can be seen by discussions on this here, I think that decision was wrong and it has cost Cameraquest some good will with this group of customers too. The distributor here for Voigtlander is extremely helpful. I have no personal experience dealing with Cameraquest. 2009/3/19 Steve Barbour <kididdoc at cox.net> > > On Mar 18, 2009, at 7:57 AM, George Lottermoser wrote: > > My only experience with these is the 15mm. >> I've had the lens for a little over 2 years - so far so good. >> While these reports give one pause; >> > > especially when one finds that warranty does not include events that > normally are covered...Steve > > > > > The prices and optics are so good >> that we'd have to assume >> that they're cutting costs somewhere >> (mechanical design or manufacture). >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> On Mar 17, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Henning Wulff wrote: >> >> I've had a 50 Nokton that had the aperture blades come unattached and at >>> present both my 15 and 12 CV's need parts retightened. Things inside the >>> 12 >>> are rattling alarmingly. I've had to retighten the mount on the 21 CV. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Cheers Geoff 'Life's too short for mediocre glass' http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/ http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman