Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:29:25 -0700
References: <17D17A073BA6420B99A530220E4EA6F5@jimnichols> <3A722AD6-7039-42C2-927D-588850E449F0@embarqmail.com> <2B854B9B-E3C7-4914-B246-12951A80D254@mac.com> <3e7573d40903161828g402c7ec0k8608838fa4e674d2@mail.gmail.com>
 
You either move to the right, or,,,,, 

Standing still on this chart  is not so cool........

Frank Filippone


>>
>>  This set me to thinking.  I don't propose a new survey but I wonder if
>>> the peak is drifting to the right?
>>>
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] LUG Age Distribution Chart from 2004)