Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Sun Feb 1 11:10:56 2009
References: <C5AB32A5.49477%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Marco, get a Minox  (true Z-scale) .      ;-)

make sure the model you get has the Complan lens.

Seth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabinergroup.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux


>I have LTM stuff. A IIIF and three lenses; some finders.
> The image circle its designed to work around is 43.3 just like the M 
> system
> but for some reason it just seems all to be a smaller scale.
> If my LTM stuff is H0 scale then the M stuff seems to be a S train set.
> http://www.internethobbies.com/inmodtrain.html
>
> Its like someone took a bicycle pump to the stuff.
> Now with this new line of super wide Noctilux its gone to 0 scale train 
> set
> size. Whose got a basement big enough?
> Not very Leica like. The stuff weights a ton.
> And considering what nine tens of its job description is all about there's
> not excuse for it. Lots of money and weight and time and materials goes 
> into
> making sure a Leica lens unlike other companies don't stuff off at all at
> the edges. Any Pentax or Minolta company cam make a lens which is sharp in
> the center and cost a hundred bucks. Leica glass cost thousands and are
> sharp out to the edges much more so.
> What a waste!
> I do have an Olympus Pen Ft set (N trainset scale) and I know what that
> looks like and feels like to pick up in my hands.
> I also know what Nikon DX glass looks like next to most of its full frame
> counterparts. And its relative price advantage.
> Its a waste having monster full frame glass doing half frame photography.
> The smaller and image scale a lens is designed to work with the sharper 
> its
> Circle of confusion is going to be and the cheaper its going to be to 
> make.
> With the exception of Z scale gear which requires micro brain salad 
> surgery
> to put the battery in.
>
> The Summarits' are not that small. They still go with my S Scale train 
> set.
>
> The new  24/3.2 is my kind of lens.
>
> Smaller, slower and therefore cheaper.
> The slow lane was always offered in the Leica catalog.
> I predict that for every 1.4 they sell they sell 5 3.2 24's.
> They'll realize the value of compactness.
> And not bicycle pump ness.
> And consider making the next lens for the image circle which its going to 
> be
> used for.
> People will order two. One for each car.
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>> From: <grduprey@mchsi.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:32:40 +0000
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>>
>> They are already sharper than any other digital camera can record, how 
>> sharp
>> to you want? My 28 Elmarit Asph is dam small and light already, in fact 
>> my
>> complaint is that the grip ring is to narrow to get a good grip to mount 
>> the
>> lens and remove it. Any smaller and I could not use it. If it was any
>> sharper, I could not tell anyway. There is also the 35 Summilux pre-asph, 
>> the
>> 50 Summicron, how much smaller do you want. All the Summarits are small 
>> and
>> light weight. I have not handled the new 24/3.2, but I suspect it is much
>> smaller than the Elmarit and the new Summilux for sure. Looks to me like 
>> they
>> are already giving you what you want.
>>
>>
>> Gene -------------- Original message from Mark Rabiner
>> <mark@rabinergroup.com>: --------------
>>
>>
>>> A lens optimized to the format it's working in has advantages.
>>> They would not just be cheaper they'd be sharper.
>>> And smaller.
>>> And lighter.
>>> All very Leica M or Leica  LTM valued characteristics.
>>>
>>> But only if it seemed they for real are not going to be going full 
>>> frame.
>>> Meaning not anytime in the foreseeable future.
>>>
>>> ... Which is what it looks like to me.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not that they'd be "cheaper".
>>> They'd cost what they should cost.
>>>
>>> IN the 90's or before we'd not pay for a 4 thousand dollar Hasselblad 
>>> lens
>>> to adapt to a 35mm camera when we are shooting 35mm. Shoot the format 
>>> your
>>> glass is.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> From:
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group
>>>> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:58:18 +0000
>>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They have said all along that they would produce a full frame camera 
>>>> when it
>>>> became practible. So why make a reduced coverage set of Digital lenses?
>>>> The
>>>> Summarits and 28 Elmarit Asph, and the new 24/3.4 are all priced at a 
>>>> lower
>>>> more reasonable price range similar to the Zeiss lenses. No need to 
>>>> make
>>>> cheaper Digital lenses.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gene -------------- Original message from Ric Carter :
>>>> --------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Surely a cheaper, smaller Leica lens could be produced for the M8
>>>>> since the circle of coverage would be smaller. It would have at least
>>>>> those two advantages.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still, we see and hear only of compatible (read full 35mm  frame)
>>>>> lenses.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, maybe this indicates that Leica sees a full 35mm frame sensor in
>>>>> its future?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ric Carter
>>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, no, no, no Mark.
>>>>>> No because they already make a new range of extremely compact modest
>>>>>> aperture lenses, the Summarits.
>>>>>> Those are tiny, relatively cheaper and have nearly all of the
>>>>>> performance of
>>>>>> the other modern designs but still covering your full 35mm crop
>>>>>> circle.
>>>>>> No because the M8 sensor capturea a stunning amount of information
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> their best glass already.
>>>>>> No because the resolution of the M8 sensor is already appropriate if
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> want to go mathematical and calculate crop circles of confusion.
>>>>>> No because any 'DX' lens would be useless on the film Ms that Leica
>>>>>> still
>>>>>> makes.
>>>>>> No because any 'DX' lens would  be useless on any future 35mm sensor 
>>>>>> M
>>>>>> camera.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The extra capability mentioned with the Elmar 24 for example is the
>>>>>> performance in the outer field which is not recorded by the M8 'crop
>>>>>> circle'
>>>>>> Performance in the extrem corners is pretty academic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did I mention no? ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/1/31 Mark Rabiner
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These super lenes by Leica to be used at a fraction of a fraction
>>>>>>> of its
>>>>>>> capabilities on an M8 with a 1.33 crop factor its enough but not
>>>>>>> quite
>>>>>>> enough to get someone to shoot film.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leica could make some killer DX lenes for the M8.
>>>>>>> Incredibly sharp compact glass designed for the 1.33 crop circle
>>>>>>> factor.
>>>>>>> Film shooters are getting to be the tip of the iceberg of a niche.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A niche niche.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>> Weather is here, wish you were beautiful
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1928 - Release Date: 01/30/09 
17:31:00


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Erwin reviews new Summilux)