Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Tri X
From: tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray)
Date: Fri Jan 30 07:12:31 2009
References: <49827351.6080906@craigschroeder.com> <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E93C7@case-email.casefoods.com>

XTOL with times and temps right out of the XTOL pdf.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:56 AM, David Rodgers <drodgers@casefarms.com> 
wrote:
> I'd start with what's on the box (which I don't have in front of me
> right now) and go from there.
>
> I tend to push most films above what is written on the box. I rate Tri-X
> at 640. I get plenty of detail in the shadows, and I get highlights I
> like. I'm not real keen on pulling films. I'd rather push a slower film
> than pull a faster film.
>
> Everyone needs to develop some of their own film now and then. It's a
> good exercise to remind a person that photography is more than computers
> and electronics.
>
>
>> I'm thinking about gong back to developing my own film.  With the new
>> Tri X what are users/developers using for chemicals, times temp. etc.
>>
>> ernie nitka
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from craig at craigschroeder.com (Craig Schroeder) ([Leica] Tri X)
Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Tri X)