Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]After being up for 24 hours, the petition has been signed by 144 people, after deducting 14 prank signatures. Here are some of the comments posted: > The price of owning Leica digital gear is already through the roof. > Many people will sacrifice a lot to get a M8, but then all they can > afford is second-hand Leica lenses. The cost and the hassle of > having them coded is totally unncessary and unjustified, and > perceived by many as an abusive way for Leica to pump as much money > as possible from the pockets of their customers. > > Own M2, M8 and a variety of coded Leica lenses. I do not really want > to modify my non-coded Leica lenses (by machining or replacement of > the flange). It just seems criminal to defile such masterpieces. So > please include a manual lens selection in the firmware. > > I cannot work without my Leica lenses long enough to send them to be > coded. > > I own an MP and six lenses, none of which are coded. The expense of > coding, as well as the risk of shipping damage/loss is the main > reason I have not bought an M8. The ability to use old lenses on a > digital camera is very appealing to me. > > Excellent update idea for an excellent camera. > > I stay in Singapore. Its takes at least 1month to code lenses. Its > not possible for me to do it, as result I need to use 3rd party > software to fix it (cornerfix) > > I?am also missing this feature al lot and it is one of the reasons > why I waited for years to get an M8. I would only invest in a future > M9 if it also - besides lenses - has a lens identification firmware, > at least for LEITZ and LEICA lenses. > > I own an M8, M6, M5, MP, MP3, M3, M2, R9, R4, and SL2, as well as > over a dozen lenses. I have owned Leicas since 1963. I am heavily > committed to Leica mentally, emotionally, and financially. I agree > that Leica AG would serve the interests of its numerous R8 customers > by making lens identification in software an alternative to having > their lenses coded by Leica AG. I cannot think of a good reason for > Leica AG not to offer this option if it has any sense of > responsibility to its loyal customers, as I believe and trust that > it does. > > I support making Leica M8 firmware possible ti identify the Leica > lens attached -- rather than coding at $175 for each lense. > > i done it. If you in Asia, its takes at least 1month to code > anything, so there is no way i can do it. > > I own and use M8 extensively, and it is a great camera! Adding this > in the firmware would be of great help, I will not send any lenses > for coding anyway because of costs and waiting time... > > I own and enjoy using an M8, an M6 ttl, and eight different lenses. > For financial and logistical reasons (pita factor), of these, only > three have been coded. Several viable hand-coding solutions have > proliferated over the course of the M8s lifespan, which have already > largely eliminated any economic in incentive for not implementing a > firmware-based means for lens identification. > > I have been a loyal Leica customer for 20 years, and I feel this is > the least Leica can do. > > Please implement this option as it makes tremendous sense, or > explain very carefully why this cannot be done. > > I do have many Leica lenses and 3 Zeiss. I do not have over 1000 > Euro to spend in coding all those lenses. ?Mitch/Potomac, MD http://www.flickr.com/photos/malland/sets/72157594271568487/