Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica R lenses on Nikon bodies with the Leitax bayonet
From: drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers)
Date: Mon Jan 19 09:15:24 2009

Thanks, Jim.

I've got several options regarding where to proceed. I sent it off for
repair. I'm sure it can be restored to original. 

However, my preference is to have the inner rings somehow affixed to
each other, so the lens would always operate in "M" mode. I've inquired
about that option. I have to wait to hear back. I wouldn't think it
would be too difficult for an expert technician to link up the two
rings. Doing so would meet my objectives without my having to buy an
expensive part. :-) 

The option to convert the lens back to R would be nice, but it's not
important to me. I don't plan on ever buying another R body. I don't see
myself shooting film in anything but my M system, Rolleiflex for my Toyo
View Camera. 

Further, I don't see myself buying a digital R body. I don't even know
what digital R bodies are available. IMO, used R lenses are an
incredible value right now if you look strictly at performance vs cost.
Perhaps that's because there aren't a lot of options, outside of older
film cameras, if you want to use them. 

DaveR


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Nichols [mailto:jhnichols@lighttube.net] 
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 10:20 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lenses on Nikon bodies with the Leitax
bayonet

Thanks, David.  I hope you can find a way to salvage the 28.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica R lenses on Nikon bodies with the Leitax
bayonet


> Jim,
> 
> Sorry I didn't reply sooner. I'm having some problems with my mail
> server and I'm missing some messages. 
> 
> Even if an adapter or camera doesn't touch the diaphragm lever, the
> lever is still important to the operation of the lens. It's part of
the
> linkage between the aperture ring that you turn on the lens, and the
> lens diaphragm itself.  
> 
> Doug explained things better than I could. It's difficult to describe
> how the inner and outer aperture rings interact, but pretty apparent
if
> you look inside the lens. 
> 
> On the first lens I converted everything worked fine and the lenses
> operates like a Takumar in set to "M". On the second lens the
diaphragm
> arm rubbed against the bayonet. The friction kept the aperture from
> opening and closing smoothly. This was on a conversion to F mount. I'm
> not at all familiar with how the Oly adapter operates. 
> 
> DaveR 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Nichols [mailto:jhnichols@lighttube.net] 
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:56 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lenses on Nikon bodies with the Leitax
> bayonet
> 
> Doug,
> 
> My question to David was not really about his lens. He is aware that I
> am 
> about to receive a similar lens which I plan to use, with an
appropriate
> 
> adapter, on my Oly E-510.  I assumed that, with no contact between the
> body 
> mechanism and the piece that David broke, the lens would stop down to
> the 
> setting called for by the aperture ring.  In other words, I assumed
the
> lens 
> would operate similar to a Takumar when set to "M".  If this is not
> correct, 
> I could be in trouble with my plans to use the lens on the Oly.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 11:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lenses on Nikon bodies with the Leitax
> bayonet
> 
> 
>> Jim Nichols wrote:
>>
>>>If I install the 28 on an adapter which has no mechanism to contact
> the 
>>>lens
>>>part that broke, will the aperture ring still operate the aperture
> leaves?
>>
>> Depends on how much broke off.  The aperture ring is directly
> connected to 
>> the inner aperture ring, (the thing that stops the arm) and in all of
> the 
>> lenses I've worked on it's immediately inboard of the aperture ring. 
>> Break off enough of the arm and it will miss the stop and close to
> minimum 
>> aperture or smaller, no matter what the aperture ring is set to.
>>
>> The arm is part of the inner aperture ring assembly which as a new 
>> replacement part was $300 a number of years ago.
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>





In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Leica R lenses on Nikon bodies with the Leitax bayonet)