Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Question about M8 exposure
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed Jan 14 22:40:50 2009
References: <D01FE636-BEAA-45DB-BD07-F7A38FC6B7F6@frozenlight.eu> <DD73D55A85F34A48A3C69D850D22B171@dadquad>

Thanks Geoff, I did not mean to start a discussion, just a genuine  
question.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Jan 15, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Here we go, the discussion starts again now ;-)
> I'm of the 'do not routinely underexpose' school. I think I am a  
> school of
> one here.
> I try to keep as many of the highlight tones as possible. When the  
> linear
> capture is adjusted by the gamma curve to approximate human vision,  
> some of
> those tones are pushed down into the mid-tones and darks. Remember  
> that half
> of all the possible tones are used to represent the first  
> (brightest) stop
> of your dynamic range. The more tones you start with the better for  
> maximum
> possible quality. Also my experience has been that under-exposure  
> can make
> for more noise in the shadows, especially with higher ISOs.
> Lots of people here will prove to you that -1/3 or more will still  
> give you
> great results. I respect all of their opinions and experience. I  
> like to
> start with the biggest possible tonal range in the DNG. Remember  
> that the
> clipping warning on your camera LCD is only an approximation based  
> on the
> jpg settings.
>
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: [Leica] Question about M8 exposure
>
> I have noticed that most of the M8 images posted here have exposure
> compensation of -1/3 stop or -2/3 stop applied to them. Is there any
> particular reason for doing that? I have not noticed any tendency  
> for my M8
> to overexpose (I shoot on aperture priority and auto ISO most of the  
> time).
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Question about M8 exposure)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Question about M8 exposure)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Question about M8 exposure)