Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some thoughts on 100 years of Leica
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Sat Jan 3 11:26:36 2009
References: <000001c96dd7$2c4e6060$84eb2120$@net>


tl wrote:

>Hi to all,
>
> 
>
>I gave my son his first big boy camera for Christmas this year.  It was a
>Nikon D60 which was very appropriate for his photographic talents to
>develop.  He was looking at some lenses and he was astounded that they cost
>more than the camera body.  I had to point out to him that we own the lenses
>forever, it's the camera body that goes out of production.  I have lenses
>that I used on my Nikon F purchased in 1969 that work on my Nikon D3 today,
>albeit without auto focus and auto exposure.  For the centennial, I would
>vote for images from Leica glass.   This would expand our family of
>potential photographers who have Canon or 4/3s bodies fitted with Canon
>Glass. 
>
4/3 is being sold by Leica - not much I'm afraid - but certainly not 
meant for using Canon glass - they sell an R adaptor for R glass instead 
;-)
phx

>I think that it is a tribute to Leica's optical prowess to see the
>lengths photographers go to put that glass on modern digital bodies.  It is
>the Leica glass that is enduring.  That's my two cents.  
>
> 
>
>Regards,
>
>Tom L
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Some thoughts on 100 years of Leica)
In reply to: Message from tlianza at comcast.net (tl) ([Leica] Some thoughts on 100 years of Leica)