Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: IMGH: RE: [Leica] LUG Yearbook: Now We Are 90!
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Sun Dec 28 13:34:01 2008
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20081227232412.00c4dc38@mail.threshinc.com> <7auabm$1ui37q@pd3mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca> <0DF3F008FB654F20BEB9D5F21A405F89@dadquad>

Geoff !
ROTFPMAO
Phx


Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Ted counsels the LUG
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/lf/TP.html>
>
>
>Cheers
>Geoff
>http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Subject: RE: [Leica] LUG Yearbook: Now We Are 90!
>
>At 08:29 PM 12/27/2008 -0800, Ted "Blood 'N Guts" Grant wrote:
>
>  
>
>>WAKE UP YOU UNCOMMITTED MORONS!
>>    
>>
>
> 
>
>Peter said; imagined :-)
>Subject: RE: [Leica] LUG Yearbook: Now We Are 90!
>
>  
>
>>>Why did I suddenly get a vision of the famous flag backdrop from the
>>>      
>>>
>movie 
>
>"Patton," but with Ted,  Leica and Noctilux substituting for George C. 
>
>Scott with riding crop...?
>
> 
>
>(Of course it would have to be a Canadian flag...)<<
>
> 
>
>http://www.art.com/asp/sp-asp/_/pd--12149413/sp--A/igid--785107/George_C_Sco
>tt.htm?sOrig=CAT
><http://www.art.com/asp/sp-asp/_/pd--12149413/sp--A/igid--785107/George_C_Sc
>ott.htm?sOrig=CAT&sOrigID=10829&ui=2B23B284B9034CEE9A0873715C92B705>
>&sOrigID=10829&ui=2B23B284B9034CEE9A0873715C92B705<<<<<<
>
> 
>
>Hi Peter,
>
>Well now if that's how the message came across then it worked. :-) Thank you
>for putting it in perspective! :-) And yes with a Canadian flag backdrop
>would be just perfect! :-)
>
> 
>
>ted
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>At 08:29 PM 12/27/2008 -0800, Ted "Blood 'N Guts" Grant wrote:
>
> 
>
>  
>
>>WAKE UP YOU UNCOMMITTED MORONS!
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Now I bet that's the biggest word surprise you've had flashed in yer 
>>face
>>    
>>
>on
>
>  
>
>>the LUG! :-)
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Like there's a message here, that is of course if you don't give a damn 
>>and
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>figure why be involved with this group of show and tells! Shame on all 
>>of
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>you who have not sent an image or two!
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>>Remember what we said... "No one is famous on this list!" We're all a 
>>bunch
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>of people who have fun taking pictures . In many cases of each other.
>>    
>>
>Surely
>
>  
>
>>you all have one to send, there are no super duper prizes if you submit!
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>However there is the wonderful feeling of opening the book to .YOUR 
>>PAGE OR
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>PAGES WITH YOUR PICTURE OR PICTURES! ...
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
>>OH YEAH I FORGOT EVERYONE ON THE LUG IS A MULTI-PUBLISHED SHOOTER, SO 
>>"WHY
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>SWEAT HAVING A COUPLE MORE PUBLISHED?"  Sorry to bother some of you.
>>    
>>
>Thanks.
>
>  
>
>>Have a nice day morons!
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Christmas is over, I'm no longer the Grinch! However I can be the 
>>biggest
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>pain in THE ass you've ever had.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>NOW MOVE IT! THAT'S NOT A REQUEST THAT'S AN ORDER, SO MOVE YOU'RE Ass!!!!!
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Thank you!
>>ted
>>    
>>
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] LUG Yearbook: Now We Are 90!)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] LUG Yearbook: Now We Are 90!)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) (IMGH: RE: [Leica] LUG Yearbook: Now We Are 90!)