Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 6x17 lust
From: imagist3 at (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 27 08:22:12 2008
References: <> <> <>

Did the BigShot ever make it into production?
It seemed always about to appear.

Fond regards,

On Dec 27, 2008, at 9:05 AM, wrote:

> There was once the bigshot: 
> 9604cs.html
> BWs Gordon
> Saturday, December 27, 2008, 1:29:54 PM, you wrote:
> MR> Any 2 and a 1/4 square camera a Rolleiflex or old Hasselblad  
> would be twice
> MR> the frame size of the S2 only shooting film instead of just a  
> capture area.
> MR> There does not seem to be a medium format system like the  
> traditional
> MR> Hasselblad in which a digital back you'd get for it is very  
> close at all to
> MR> 2 1/4 square. Though some are  hyped as "full frame" digital.  
> Referring to
> MR> full frame 645 not 6x6. And not even that.
> MR> 6x6 =  2 and a 1/4 square
> MR> Its 6 cm
> MR> Mark William Rabiner
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Replies: Reply from leowesson at (leo wesson) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Reply from lindnich at ( ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Reply from mark at (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
In reply to: Message from richard.lists at (Richard Man) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Message from mark at (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Message from lindnich at ( ([Leica] 6x17 lust)