Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The 8000 you can find all over the internet they never worked. Problems problems problmes The 9000 fixed all the problems. Mark William Rabiner > From: Richard Man <richard.lists@gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:45:47 -0800 > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion > > How about the LS-8000? How does it compare to the LS-9000 or the LS-5000? > Any personal experience? > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Mark Rabiner > <mark@rabinergroup.com>wrote: > >> Yes except you're reading the specs and I'm talking about actual hands on >> and extensive use corroborated by other people who had the same experience >> with it. The 5000 scans the grain and gives you a good idea of the grain >> quality. >> The 4000 you don't even get the grain at all. >> >> The scans I'd make would not just be for uploading to a website page. >> It would be for printing often up to 13x19. >> I have a whole portfolio of 13x19 inkjet prints. >> Many from scans. >> >> Mark William Rabiner >> > > -- > // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com > // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information