Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Len, I believe you are correct about turning off IS when on a tripod. Even my lowly 28-135IS came with instructions to do so for the reasons you mentioned. Rob On Dec 26, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Leonard Taupier wrote: > The problem may be because it is an IS lens. I assume the lens, at > 10 lbs, most likely is on a tripod. If so there are minute > vibrations between the lens and the tripod which cause the IS to try > and correct. This correction can also cause the autofocus to > continuosly focus, or bounce, causing the photo to be slightly out > of focus. It is shutter speed dependent of course. The best way to > get a sharp photo with this long of a lens is to have both IS and > autofocus off when mounted on a tripod. The grizzly photo was taken > at 1/250 sec which is slow enough to account for this kind of > problem. The moose photo was taken at 1/800 sec which should be fast > enough to overcome the problem so the photo appears sharp in the > back focus area. I have spent a long time on this issue trying to > figure out why some of my photos were not as sharp as they should be > and not nearly as good as my handheld shots. It is no coincidence > that the sharpest photos with long lenses belong to the photographer > that shots with manual focus equipment. Also some of the sharpest > long autofocus lens shots used sand bags and not a tripod. Of course > these are only my opinions based on my own experiences and > observations. > > Len >