Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, surely you're talking here about journalistic photography. Not an AA strong point. It's like saying you don't like a Vincent Black Lightening because it's not a car. Cheers, Paul. ******* Paul Hardy Carter +44 (0)20 3239 9573 www.paulhardycarter.com www.lightstalkers.org/phc www.twitter.com/paulhardycarter Skype: paulhardycarter ******* On 22 Dec 2008, at 20:46, Bob W wrote: > That's not for me to decide - email Elliott Erwitt and ask him to > explain > himself. > > However, I do think that subject matter is the first and most > important > aspect of photography; technique is secondary to subject matter. A > great > many fine art photographers appear to think that technique is more > important > than subject, which is one reason why there are so many beautifully > printed > but boring pictures of dried up logs beside lakes, and so few > exciting but > technically bad pictures of the D-Day landings. > > Another Magnum photographer, David Hurn, has some interesting > things to say > about the primacy of subject matter in 'On Being a Photographer'. > > Bob