Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M-lenses on M8
From: len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Mon Dec 8 13:05:16 2008
References: <5f1be6b50812081034qf848f7x195949a0439bc5ee@mail.gmail.com><5f1be6b50812081037p641f649eo97659f85ec9b52f9@mail.gmail.com> <a3f189160812081122k5b604a5q3c5329ac1a064cde@mail.gmail.com> <B387023C65D04391B4921B3FB5274392@D1S9FY41>

Hello, Seth. It's great to see you on the list.

You will love the 50/2 rigid Summicron on the M8. While it is lower  
in contrast then the Summilux Asph for instance, I find it's very  
smooth and detailed. Photos taken with it are wonderful. There are a  
few on list that use it all the time.

I can't speak of the 35/2.8 Summaron but I did test two very clean  
3.5 versions (LTM and M version with goggles) just yesterday. The M8  
brutally shows their very low contrast. They can be made to look fair  
by using the auto levels feature in Photoshop but without  
manipulation I wouldn't use them.

I have never used the other two lenses.

Cheers,
Len


On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Seth Rosner wrote:

> Hello friends,
>
> What a coincidentally useful time to return LUG-wise! I'm finally  
> considering an M8 or M8.2; would wish to use 35/2,8 Summaron, 50/2  
> Rigid Summicron, 25/4 CV Skopar and 90,2,8 Elmarit (the 5-glass  
> 1958 rendition). Any comments/opinions on good or bad imaging with  
> any of these on an M8? Thanks.
>
> Best to all,
>
> Seth
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan) ([Leica] Dave's PAW (*) 2008 #49)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Dave's PAW (*) 2008 #49)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] M-lenses on M8)