Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8
From: bill at grimwood.net (Bill Grimwood)
Date: Thu Dec 4 11:00:56 2008
References: <120420081810.20451.49381D04000CE3A000004FE3219791336303010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

Thanks.  I think I will have my original TriElmar coded.

Bill


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <grduprey@mchsi.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M8


> Bill,
>
> You only need to have the coding on the WA's greater than 35 mm, my 
> opinion, but first I would try them out to see if you really need the 
> coding.  I only have coding on my two widest lenses, and that is because 
> they came with the coding as they were new.  My 35 Summilux pre asph, 50 
> summicron, and 90 Tele-Elmairt do not have the coding and I see no reason 
> to get them coded.  Have fun with the new M8.
>
> Gene
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Bill Grimwood" <bill@grimwood.net>
>>
>> I finally succumbed and bought a new M8.  I need several lenses updated 
>> with the
>> spots.  Have any of you used anything besides the Leica spots.  Are the 
>> others
>> worthwhile or would I be wasting my money in the long run.
>>
>> What other suggestions do you have?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Bill Grimwood
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 


In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] M8)