Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Stab on? congrats in either case phx Chris Williams wrote: > 2500iso is the new 400iso. Deal with it, move on, Leica, get some > higher iso performance please! > > Chris who just sold some 16x20 images shot at 4000iso hand held > outside during a full moon in the Quarter. > > Chris > NOLA > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "F?elix L?opez de Maturana" > Subject: [Leica] Re: OT: Nikon's got something.......... > > >> > >> >>> I believe it is not the Sony chip. Sure they can charge over $5000, >>> if it >>> > is >>> > good enough. Sony seems to have limitations above ISO400 according to >>> > reviews...I bet Nikon delivers clean files at ISO 1600. It also >>> has a > crop >>> > mode at 10mp. >>> > Cheers >>> > Jayanand >> >> I'm actually using both the Nikon D700 *and* the Sony Alpha 900 with >> his outstanding Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar 24-70mm f2.8 zoom and if >> Nikon images at 3.200 ISO are almost usable the Sony has some quality >> up to 1.600 ISO. Every sensor has noise at *all* ISO value and very >> often some guys see the bottle half empy or...half full. Beeing the >> same sensor only the better experience of Nikon making cameras may >> suggest the new D3x could be better than the Sony concerning noise. >> Let's see.. To remain on topic I've compared images from the Sony >> with th CZ zoom and the M8 with a Summicron ASPH and surely due to >> the much bigger resolution the Sony images look more detailed for me >> >> Regards >> >> Felix >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >