Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Olympus Pen Ft
From: leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Mon Oct 27 13:45:45 2008
References: <B8B42CC3A8304F65BA414612264BF925@Family> <69975C1BE9D946FD84A5D92FCBE4BF4E@dadquad> <75B2CF5C-0AB1-49CE-95B1-5C871428CB5E@frozenlight.eu> <D124D872-76FB-4287-AFC3-2A20FA449E9F@protozoic.com> <4BD69D91-A0DE-435E-A4A1-FCC2182EF055@frozenlight.eu>
I also found Neopan 1600 has more pleasant midtones than other hispeed
films.
Didier
>I found Neopan to be much easier than the others in terms of both
>developing and scanning--especially the latter.
>
>Nathan
In reply to:
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from tgray at protozoic.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Olympus Pen Ft)