Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Mon Oct 20 11:56:55 2008
References: <48FC7AE2.3020300@sympatico.ca> <a2f8f4470810200605i3605f53en140fe46c4a819732@mail.gmail.com> <48FCB734.9070909@tele2.fr> <a2f8f4470810201003t48ae50fco6d139236c162081d@mail.gmail.com> <48FCC450.7010805@tele2.fr>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Philippe AMARD <philippe.amard@tele2.fr>
wrote:
> But use them to try things you wouldn't have otherwise.
>
And if you had a good idea but the film crapped out on you, what then.
Photographic moments can rarely be conjured up on demand, unless
you're doing a still life whith controlled lighting and wax fruit that
remains fresh.
I respect my work. I control what I can control (the technical
process) and I try to capture fleeting images. I can't control
outdated film and I am not interested in its defects.
Daniel
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)