Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Palo Alto Control, we have a possible solution and an alternative
From: leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Thu Oct 16 08:53:27 2008
References: <E8CA95F1BB674B3BBDB3F3188E353E51@dadquad> <763D423AF217DD1C6826A9A7@rutabook.waverley.reid.org> <48F7418B.8060809@csdco.com> <55B8DA2D1B075B81F2AD14EB@hindolveston.reid.org> <48F75D6F.50404@csdco.com>
Just to throw my modest peso in - what about using greylisting? It doesn't
eat that much resources and is strongly effective. I've reduced the spam
traffic for up to 99% on my mailserver in the now 8 months I used it.
Eventually you could combine it with your LUG software so that the
mailadresses of registered members are automatically whitelisted.
Didier
http://www.greylisting.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting
In reply to:
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Palo Alto Control, we have a problem)
Message from john.nebel at csdco.com (John Nebel) ([Leica] Palo Alto Control, we have a possible solution and an alternative)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Palo Alto Control, we have a possible solution and an alternative)
Message from john.nebel at csdco.com (John Nebel) ([Leica] Palo Alto Control, we have a possible solution and an alternative)