Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]why in the world would they say it has a 24mm lens? while the angle of view will appear similar to a 24 the depth of field and other characteristics certainly will not appear similar i'd sure like folks to begin to speak about reality tells us the actual focal length the angle of view and chip size then at least people could and would learn meaningful photographic language Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Sep 27, 2008, at 1:02 PM, slobodan dimitrov wrote: > I happened on the following review, for the Panasonic DMC-LX3K. > Any merit to it? > http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/9604.html > s.d. > > > On Sep 25, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Joseph Yao wrote: > >> I have had both for sometime. There is indeed a difference, and a >> big one: >> PRICE! >> >> >> On 9/26/08 1:07 AM, "slobodan dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gene; >>> Any chance of you trying out the Leica D-LUX 4 and the Panasonic >>> DMC- >>> LX3 with an SD card? >>> I'd like to see what differences there are, if any! >>> s.d. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information