Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Sun Sep 14 11:41:22 2008
References: <BC51B85B-B2BD-4ED7-9775-74C20ADE9B61@frozenlight.eu>
 
Nathan

If you are only looking, it doesn't matter ;-)

Jerry


Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> We paid the last visit of the season to our beach bar yesterday--they 
> close down for the autumn today. Not that it was particularly autumnal 
> yet:
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/gallery/4253606_netUM#372048818_2fQq4-O-LB
>
> My 19-year old son and his visiting friend from England enjoyed 
> playing with my E3, the 50-200mm zoom and the 1.4 extender. For some 
> reason, it was mainly the long end that interested them ;-)
>
> After looking at this picture, we debated the key question about 
> whether these boobs were surgically enhanced or not, without reaching 
> a clear conclusion. I think they are fake.
>
> Nathan
Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)
 In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 13/09/2008: fake or real?)