Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Lottermoser George wrote: > I almost added a similar scale. > However, I've no real clue what the 60's, 70's, 80's dollar > (Canadian or US) amounts to today. > All I know for sure is my own shock at what things cost today; > in relation to how little people are willing to pay for professional > photographic and/or design services today. > > Not only does "charlie" have a digital camera (so 'we' don't have to > hire a pro); but his wife has InDesign and Illustrator with a bunch > of free templates on her computer (so 'we' don't have to hire a pro > designer either). > Together, they're an untrained, inexperienced power to be reckoned > with. now that sounds very familiar.... Steve > > > And it shows in what we see passing for visual communication today. > > ; ~ ( > > Fond regards, > George > > george@imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:19 AM, slobodan dimitrov wrote: > >> Lets say Ted bought his SL2 in 1975 at the then price of $1600US. >> Then again, he always has two bodies at any given time of the same >> model. Today that would be about $6,100US. But since it's probably >> purchased in Canada with its traditional higher Leica prices, I bet >> that SL2 reflects closer to 8K or 9K in today's dollars. It's not >> that far from current pricing. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information