Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So once again, this extreme right wing Supreme Court has come down on the side of business vs. consumers. Why am I not surprised? Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Aug 20, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Marc James Small wrote: > > The US Supreme Court in a poorly reported Opinion not yet posted to > their Web Site seems to have ruled in the past several days that > such Fair Trade Laws are Constitutionally impermissible as breaching > the validity of contract between manufacturer and dealer. I suspect > that, once I read the Opinion, I will agree with it philosophically > but I certainly am glad that the Warren Court didn't rule that way > on the initial challenge in 1955 as then my book would have been > half its length .... > > Marc > > > msmall@aya.yale.edu > Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information