Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon Aug 18 10:01:44 2008
References: <367890.83837.qm@web27303.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <6174BA98-254A-4E96-9C84-455A2A5AE120@frozenlight.eu> <p06230913c4cf526fb70a@[10.1.16.146]>

At 12:49 PM 8/18/2008, you wrote:
>Photoshop and LR are equally stable on my computers, and that's very stable.
>
>In my estimation Photoshop makes more compromises with respect to 
>image quality than Lightroom, and that is why Photoshop is only used 
>at the end for the specific things it does better. The fact that 
>when you open a file in Photoshop you are then making changes to 
>that (opened) file at each step as opposed to Lightroom where you 
>are creating a series of instructions that only get applied at the 
>time of exporting makes a difference if a number of different things 
>have to get done to a file. The LR way is quite definitely 
>theoretically better, and it can be demonstrated even though it 
>might take some extreme files. In studio situations it would be 
>almost impossible to see any difference.
>
>In either case, the original file is not changed, but file used in 
>the intermediate stages has been degraded by Photoshop but not by Lightroom.
>
>When I have an especially low contrast image that needs fairly 
>drastic contrast enhancements to be useable, and then local 
>contrast, dodging, gradations and other things have to be applied, 
>the Photoshop file turns out to be rougher than the LR file, as more 
>information got thrown away in the intermediate stages.
>
>For sharpening, I agree that it has to be done after everything 
>else, and especially re-sizing. When I'm ready to print and know the 
>size of the output, and type of output, I switch to editing the file 
>from LR to CS3, and then resize and use Photokit sharpener for final 
>output. If I want to print a different size, I got back to Lightroom 
>and go through the same process for the different size or output type.

That is my experience, Henning, and I work exactly the same way, even 
down to using Photokit for final sharpening.  There is a definite 
difference when you apply the same steps in LR and in PS.  Applying 
the changes as one step of instructions instead of successive steps 
seems to make a difference.  Thanks for explaining it better than I could!

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com 


In reply to: Message from daniel.ridings at yahoo.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Is Lightroom 2.0 Really Shipping?)