Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Ted gets quoted
From: clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive)
Date: Mon Aug 4 20:52:19 2008
References: <f091c6f20808041405u751c2bfet327da9708df5c4c9@mail.gmail.com> <200808042117.m74LHWir050399@server1.waverley.reid.org>
 
Infamous? Not illustrious? Not my suggestions at all.
Not sure how to get to infamous from the article.
OTOH, I should have said "some /other/ illustrious".  My finger gnomes 
ate the "other" word.
-- 
Clive - emerging from the basement in La Port County Indiana as the 
tornado warning expires.


Marc James Small wrote:
> At 05:05 PM 8/4/2008, Clive Moss wrote:
> >Hi All.
> >Ted get quoted on the Reuters blog alongside some illustrious company:
>
> So, you are suggesting that Ted is infamous and not illustrious?  Hmm 
> ... enquiring minds want to know!
>
Replies: Reply from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Vis-a-Vis)
 In reply to: Message from clive.moss at gmail.com (Clive Moss) ([Leica] Ted gets quoted)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Ted gets quoted)