Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] visoflex
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Mon Aug 4 05:11:27 2008
References: <20080803205155.4D3B53B4@resin15.mta.everyone.net> <3F8D5D58-6A76-4713-815F-415A10269C15@comcast.net> <23DB3C75E2CB4AFF87331AD3A3A0E9E6@dadquad>

The 90mm macro-Elmar does lock in extended position.


On Aug 4, 2008, at 8:01 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> And the now discontinued Elmar M 2.8 50 which did turn to lock in the
> extended position.
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On  
> Behalf Of
> Leonard Taupier
> Sent: Monday, 4 August 2008 21:18
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] visoflex
>
> Yes, Alastair, mine free wheels the same as yours. But it doesn't
> bother me as the only time I keep it collapsed is when it's in the
> case. I think the reason it's designed that way is so you can keep
> the aperture numerals on top by rotating the barrel with and without
> the close up attachment. In that case it's actually a clever design
> and different then the 50mm DR Summicron which does not collapse.
>
> Cheers,
> Len
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2008, at 11:51 PM, Alastair Firkin wrote:
>
>> Len, I must chip in and admit I replaced the Elmar C 90 with the
>> Macro Elmar recently. I wanted it for travel, to add a bit of
>> closer up ability to the M. I've not used it much yet. Seems very
>> nice, and the macro attachment works for me, but the lens barrel
>> does not lock: does yours. I mean, when collapsed, its "free"
>> wheeling.
>>
>>
>> --- len-1@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> From: Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net>
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] visoflex
>> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:04:45 -0400
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> I fully understand. My comment was a more universal observation. I
>> don't know of anyone on the LUG, other then me, that has one. Before
>> the introduction of the new Summarits it was one of Leica's least
>> expensive lenses. Plus it's a multi purpose lens, macro, portrait,
>> and a very compact telephoto. Just an observation.
>>
>> Len
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:46 PM, David Rodgers wrote:
>>
>>> Len,
>>>
>>> Maybe not so much ignore as resist consideration due to the approx
>>> $2K
>>> price tag for an f4 lens. I'd trade my 9/2.8 for a 90/4 ME in a
>>> second,
>>> because the 90/4 is uniquely Leica and I like collapsible lenses.
>>> I've
>>> wanted one since they were first introduced. OTOH, while I like
>>> rangefinders, close up photography is not one of their strengths;
>>> although the M8 might be more practical than a film body since you
>>> can
>>> see the results immediately.
>>>
>>> DaveR
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Leonard Taupier [mailto:len-1@comcast.net]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 11:01 AM
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] visoflex
>>>
>>> For some reason Lugers ignore the existence of the 90mm macro-Elmar.
>>> It is very sharp, with it's dedicated close focus attachment can
>>> capture an object as small as 3 inches across, and it's very small.
>>> It's the only lens I use for my flower photography. I have had mine
>>> for two years now. I also have a Viso III with many attachments and
>>> lens heads. I find it most useful with the 65mm Elmar and focus
>>> adapter, but also find it very useful for very close macro shots  
>>> with
>>> the bellows or telephoto use with the 200mm and 400mm Telyts. And  
>>> yes
>>> the 50mm DR Summicron works very well on the M8 but it must be
>>> mounted in close up mode. It does not require any modification  
>>> but as
>>> is cannot be mounted in normal mode.
>>>
>>> I can do it all but still prefer the 90mm macro-Elmar for every day
>>> close-ups. And I have never seen when Popflash was out of the  
>>> lens or
>>> adapter.
>>>
>>> Len
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have various viso valuables and never thought to play with them
>>>> on the M8
>>>> as yet. You folks are just masking the ground glass for the sensor
>>>> size
>>>> then? With a static set up (tripod and inanimate subject) I guess
>>>> you can
>>>> get near instant feedback via the LCD to shoot again if you need to
>>>> adjust
>>>> composition/exposure. Cool! I must leap in and try it out.
>>>> For Leo, I recall there was an article in LFI on this a little
>>>> while back.
>>>> I'll catch you off-list on that.
>>>>
>>>> One possible alternative for anyone willing to invest more: There's
>>>> the neat
>>>> little macro Elmar 90 collapsible which goes down to .7m (27 inches
>>>> or so in
>>>> old speak) on its own or .5m with the macro adaptor. The lens seems
>>>> to be
>>>> relatively inexpensive used, although you don't see the macro
>>>> adaptor as
>>>> often.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Geoff
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] visoflex
>>>>
>>>> This is really a question of how much control of the subject  
>>>> size:to
>>>> chip area - over what focusing range.
>>>>
>>>> With no additional attachments you'll have a very useable macro
>>>> range
>>>> for general macro work.
>>>> When you find yourself wanting more control of various
>>>> magnifications
>>>> (and/or working distances), you'll begin to get a feel for what
>>>> "you"
>>>> want in terms of versatility. Or you may find that it's not for
>>>> you -
>>>> as apparently many here have.
>>>>
>>>> Bottom line: a Visoflex III and any M mount lens will immediately
>>>> produce very satisfying macro results.
>>>>
>>>> Fond regards,
>>>> George
>>>>
>>>> george@imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2008, at 8:25 PM, leo wesson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What magic parts do I need to do this with my M8 assuming that I
>>>>> will use my
>>>>> 90 and 50mm summicrons?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] visoflex)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] visoflex)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] visoflex)