Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Canon G9 vs. the PanaLeicas; Interesting offer from Canon
From: leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Fri Jul 18 01:09:41 2008
References: <C4A5B7CC.1ACAE%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Mark

This reads more as an anti Canon pamphlet than something else. At least it
changes a bit from your usual anti fourthirds tirades. But, your
calculation is anyway wrong as you found out yourself.

I'm not a big Canon enthusiast (except for Canon LTM stuff), but the Canon
G9 1/1.7" sensor produces significantly less noise, than the
unsignificanzly bigger 1/1.65" D-lux sensor. Compare pictures. I did. I
find ths more relevant for evaluating a camera, than doing arithmetic
exercises.

Additionally, the Canon has an optical viewfinder (though a bit dim), while
the D-Lux let's you practise your chimping skills. 

Consider the D-Lux as a low end fourthirds camera, your all time favourite
system :-)

Didier




> 1/1.7"     4:3     14.941     9.500     7.600     5.700
> Type    Aspect Ratio    Dia. (mm)     Diagonal     Width     Height
> 
> A normal lens for this sized sensor is 7.6 millimeters.
> 
> The Leica Dlux three sensor diagonal and normal lens would be
>  15.3939mm
> 
> And the camera is half the size and twice the format.
> And twice as not ugly.
> 
> And it doesn't say "Canon" on it. 
> 
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091408leicadlux3.asp
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong9/
> 
> mark@rabinergroup.com
> Mark William Rabiner



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Canon G9 vs. the PanaLeicas; Interesting offer from Canon)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Canon G9 vs. the PanaLeicas; Interesting offer from Canon)