Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, FOM2 really bridged the time between cumbersome and expensive digital solutions and practical and useful ones. It changed the scope of the submissions, but I don't think it hurt the variety of the results in fact I think it helped to give greater scope to the final selection. Cheers --- s.dimitrov@charter.net wrote: From: slobodan dimitrov <s.dimitrov@charter.net> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> Subject: Re: [Leica] FOM2 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:27:20 -0700 An earlier era, replete with DMR missteps and the absence of a digital M. s.d. On Jun 17, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Michiel Fokkema wrote: > Hi, > > I just finished looking and reading the book. > It is magnificent. The pictures, the layout, all very good. > Very good job by Alastair. We should be grateful he made this into > this book. > > A few things that struck me. Digital is almost absent. M6 rules, as > the 35 and 50mm lens. > > Thanks again Alastair. > > Michiel Fokkema > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information