Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark I actually think that this is the most open interview that I have read from Dr Kaufmann on the subjects so far. Before I had an M8, I was concerned about the sensor crop factor too. Now having used the camera it is a non-issue for me. The practical effect was needing one more wide lens. I understand people's desire for a perfectly noise free very high ISO capability too. Right now for me I regard the mature M8's performance as superb. It's an M, it's not a DSLR. It's about the glass, isn't it? This sounds just right to me as an M enthusiast!!! Kaufmann: "Basically we provide Leica M photographers with professional caliber low-light performance the traditional Leica way, with our outstanding line of f/2 Summicron and f/1.4 Summilux lenses and the f/1.0 Noctilux. And there will be more to come!... We definitely will expand and enhance the Leica M lens line in the near future and there will be some very exciting things shown at the Photokina exposition in Cologne this fall. We will make more detailed announcements on this later this summer, but for the time being all I can tell you is what you already know -- high performance wide-angle and ultra speed lenses are a longstanding Leica tradition, and we have been expanding our M line with lenses delivering high performance at more moderate prices to extend the reach of the entire M system. Incidentally we will show something else significant for the M system at Photokina, not just lenses." I will leave any comments on a digital R to those with an interest and knowledge there, but again, you should not dismiss a smaller sensor as equivalent to a 'half frame' film camera. Leaving aside all of the other factors, the images scale in a completely different way. You would have already seen this at work with your Nikon DSLRs vs. film Nikon 35mm cameras. I bet that one of our Four thirds folks would send you a Raw file if you asked nicely. Print it big and compare for yourself. Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ -----Original Message----- Subject: [Leica] Schneider & Kaufmann shattering news http://www.popphoto.com/popularphotographyfeatures/5316/the-future-of-leica. html In this interview with Jason Schneider at RIT Andreas Kaufmann shatters a couple of very key assumptions or opinions I have about Leicas very much needed direction. Imagine no full frame digital Leica rangefinder. Imagine no digital R body. The second because our new Top Leica man seems to feel that a DSLR needs to be AF. A very very wrong feeling in my opinion. Imagine whirled peas. That's a whole lot of very bad news in one interview. Very bad PR. If I was the boss I'd fire myself on the spot. The R lineup of glass is nothing to cough at. The R system needs and deserves a compact R digital body. And so does the world. Including me! I'd buy one. I'd buy two! How about you? I don't need AutoFocus; I AM AutoFocus. I focused my 24mm Nikkor 2.8 lens down Broadway for three miles tonight from 62nd to 110. On a Nikon D40x. A whole lot of DSLR shooting is done with the AF turned off or with older AI lenses not just by me but by a lot of serious non Leica loving people I know. R&D needs to be continued to bend those little image grabbers at the ends of the CCD sensors inward so a lens right in the sensors face can be used right out to its intended image non crop circle on a digital M. And they should make for for a Hasselblad superwide while they're at it. A high end imaging company investing into crop circle formats strikes me as a highly questionable paranormal eyebrow raiser. Within 9 months with Nikon and Canon both in heavy competition bringing the prices down a huge movement will be created to anyone with the slightest pretensions to shooting a quality image to shooting 24x36 format. Kids at RIT for sure. Anyone with a bigger than letter sized inkjet printer. Ebayers who need to be shooting with the perceived latest best thing. The idea of Leica M glass coasting thousands of USD each only being used in its middle area is going to seem very off beat wacky in the year 2009. Can half frame film cameras compete against full frame cameras? Not in the production of quality images. Which means BIG PRINTS. And smaller prints and images made at very high ISO's. Imagine Leica modern mediocrity. Hasselblad went AF became it was bought out by a high tech company with little empathy and touch with Hasselblad tradition and it customer base. No heart. Hasselblad is dead. I expected more from what's happening now with Leica. I thought I was looking at some heart. You gotta have heart. Mark William Rabiner markrabiner.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information