Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Thu Apr 24 13:00:30 2008
References: <380-220084424163216484@M2W029.mail2web.com>

At 12:32 PM -0400 4/24/08, wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote:
>Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy@asc.upenn.edu> wrote:
>
>>  Light comes through the lens, hits the sensor. As soon as values reach
>>  254 the camera should save a file at that exposure which can then be
>>  merged (if necessary) with the master file so that burned highlights can
>>  be salvaged.
>
>Or with 16-bit pixels, 65534 instead of 254.



The limiting factor is dynamic range, not number of bits. The Fuji S5 
addresses that to a limited degree, but not to HDR standards.

With present sensors and photon acquisition methods it's hard to get 
real time greater dynamic range. One possibility might be to actually 
do two exposures during the nominal exposure time. Exposure time 
would then take on a new meaning, and this clearly wouldn't work when 
you need an extremely short exposure, but it should be doable when 
you only need 1/125sec.


-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?)
Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] Auto HDR -- is nobody paying attention?)