Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: the episode in which Hoppy becomes a criminal
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Wed Apr 23 07:54:25 2008
References: <000101c8a549$4c7ac8d0$6b01a8c0@dadquad>

Stupidity is a constantly renewing natural resource.
All the best! Raimo K

Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> Folks, some more pictures and a tale. While waiting to collect my child 
> from
> school I walked along a footpath adjacent to a railway station 
> photographing
> some clouds over the wire fence surrounding the property. I crossed through
> the station walkway (open to all), shot some more from the opposite 
> footpath
> then walked back through the public access  to exit. I stopped and made a
> single photograph of the clouds since there were less poles in the way.
> Within 60 secs a rail employee moved quickly to me and told me that
> photography was forbidden. I was completely surprised by this patent
> foolishness. However, I explained that I was taking a picture of the
> beautiful clouds. To no avail! Sir, all photography is forbidden on our
> property. It is against the law!
>
> This is a public thoroughfare, a school on one side , shops the other and
> the actual station platforms below. I would say several thousand people per
> week use it. Heaven forbid that any of them might have evil camera-phones
> for clandestine pictures of the dirty tiles and rubbish bins or other
> national security assets sited there. Not seeking any confrontation I left
> this worthy and fearless guardian of freedom to his patrol and agreed to
> follow his ridiculous directive. Tonight I have actually located the
> department's policy explicitly permitting me to use my camera there as an
> amateur and within limits and naturally requiring that I follow sensible
> guidelines, not flashing the drivers etc. Yet it also tells me that I must
> obey every directive from their employees or they may detain me for arrest
> by a policeman. Even worse, should you have permission under their own
> policy to take photos within their property, it is VERBOTEN to post any
> pictures on the internet in case terrorists look at them. I'm not making
> this up. What unbelievable nonsense. So there it is. This foolishness so
> incensed me that I fell compelled to share the product of my blatant and
> appalling offence with you here. I shall burn in hell, then for these 
> links.
> To compound my offence, these were taken with a fast fifty AT f 5.6!!
>
> <http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/96037500>
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/6fhkou>
>
> Oh and thank heavens this defender of national security did not detect the
> photo of the scene of the crime, else I might still be handcuffed or left
> beaten next to their Coke machine. Sssh, there's  a Senorita! But you can
> clearly see the location of their coke machine which every extremist maniac
> will be sure to pinpoint for a suicide bombing.
>
> <http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/96037503>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6r2pc8
>
> Cheers
>
> Geoff
>
>  <http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
>
>  <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>
>
>   



In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: the episode in which Hoppy becomes a criminal)