Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] More management blabla
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Mar 10 11:07:00 2008
References: <cee56220803100326h75b5484ctdd91a621995df0cb@mail.gmail.com> <20080310111411.97B02584670@smtp1.nine.ch> <004701c882a4$efe09760$6401a8c0@xyw> <cee56220803100511s6d727b74ic95e11d1b63a8814@mail.gmail.com> <9b678e0803100748k604f9f75qfb6eda3bb0d1aa1c@mail.gmail.com> <p06230902c3fb134f2250@[10.1.16.146]>
Do others believe, as I do, that when we discuss "sensor advances" we
should attempt to learn the differences between c-mos advances and
ccd advances. I find myself working over time to learn the advantages
of one over the other.
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Henning Wulff wrote:
> Since dynamic range, noise floor and low noise - high ISO
> performance are all intimately related, maybe Nikon's new sensor
> advances will also lead to significant benefits in dynamic range,
> should they make that their focus in their hi-res camera.
Replies:
Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:More management blabla)
In reply to:
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema@wanadoo.nl) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema@wanadoo.nl) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] More management blabla)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] More management blabla)