Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait...now RAW
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Mon Mar 3 10:17:52 2008
References: <20080302223928.63377D7B@resin15.mta.everyone.net> <290D28E6-3A1C-4862-A13D-C4A8200DE35C@bigpond.net.au> <3cad89990803030211q3b1d96e9n2cd7c3973a7d2b91@mail.gmail.com> <BB95CA64-2518-4B81-98F3-AEB002A29EAC@cox.net> <3cad89990803030714i3f7723c6i1b7d25e77407f65d@mail.gmail.com> <435A5CFF-7C94-43E7-A599-3F73206CF221@cox.net>
Steve Barbour wrote:
>
> Since RAW is the digital negative, why is that not also affected ?
>
> Anyone ?
>
>
It IS affected, for the better as you keep your highlights within range.
Cool!
phx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to:
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin@afirkin.com) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait with Summilux 50 asph)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Casual Portrait...now RAW)