Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net)
Date: Sat Jan 5 10:15:32 2008

Raimo K <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi>

>Since when do they use this designation?

Since 1984 at least if not earlier.

Doug Herr
Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com

>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net>
>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 3:17 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens
>
>
>> Raimo K <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi> wrote:
>>
>>>APO means apochromatic correction of the lens, there are no apochromatic
>>>elements.
>>
>> In Leica's case, APO is the designation they use for the extra-low 
>> dispersion glass which their optical designers feel is essential to 
>> designing lenses with apochromatic performance.  This is like Nikon's use 
>> of the ED designation for their extra-low dispersion glass.  Raimo is 
>> correct that there are no apochromatic elements, but there is APO glass 
>> which is used to design apochromatic lenses.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)
Reply from raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] The Tele elmarit 135 Is So A Real Pooch of a Lens)