Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] [WTB] Summicron 35mm f/2 3rd or 4th version
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Thu Jan 3 09:32:38 2008
References: <aed41d690801020817tf01a628n94ca95496b51bea0@mail.gmail.com> <C3A1D3C6.81111%mark@rabinergroup.com> <aed41d690801030817t7ebfa85ei32445119ac6b63f4@mail.gmail.com> <477D0C32.4070605@mcclary.net>
 
I assume that when KEH says "bargain", there was either a lot of finish worn
off, or it had taken some bumps. The bumps are more of a concern than the
brassing IMHO.

On Jan 3, 2008 10:24 AM, Harrison McClary <lists@mcclary.net> wrote:

> Really!  The previous owner may never have even changed the oil in it!
>
>
> Or he may have dropped it down a flight of stairs, not the soft carpeted
> ones either.
>
>
> Jeffery Smith wrote:
> >  buying new rather than "bargain" is safer in
> > that you don't know what that bargain lens has been through.
>
>
> --
> Harrison McClary
> Harrison McClary Photography
> harrison@mcclary.net
> http://www.mcclary.net
> ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography
> http://www.imagestocksouth.com
> Tobacco Road: Personal Blog:
> http://www.mcclary.net/blog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, LA
Replies: Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] [WTB] Summicron 35mm f/2 3rd or 4th version)
 In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] [WTB] Summicron 35mm f/2 3rd or 4th version)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] [WTB] Summicron 35mm f/2 3rd or 4th version)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] [WTB] Summicron 35mm f/2 3rd or 4th version)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] [WTB] Summicron 35mm f/2 3rd or 4th version)