Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It would help a great deal if you pointed to a specific example or two - rather than lumping together all the extraordinary examples we've been pointed to. Which examples do you consider "so dependent on technique (bells and whistles, packaging)? Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com www.imagist.com Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07 On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > understandable to me why some "cutting edge" photography is so > dependent on technique, > > ie "bells and whistles"... > > more packaging, the more likely it's hollow... > > at the core, empty... > > all show.... > > seems that on the other hand, when you have something really > important to say... > > you say it directly/simply... > > you want it to be easily understood... > > no hocus pocus is needed, and only gets in the way... > > that's all my friend,