Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]TIFF is non destructive on repetitive saving, JPEG is not - as you keep overwriting and saving the files, JPEG quality decays, mainly due to the lossy format. Cheers Jayanand On Nov 26, 2007 11:26 AM, Philippe Amard <phamard@numericable.fr> wrote: > I find TIFF to be a little easier to work on than JPEG, but it is only > my feeling. > BTW TIIF is what I used when I export from LRoom into PS. and it works > fine then. > Phil...x > > > Gerry Walden wrote: > > >I am afraid that you are right and you are stuck with what you get. > > > >Gerry > > > >On 25/11/2007, Victor Rubin <vroger@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi All: > >>Well, I've finally started shooting RAW and I love it. I did find, > >>however, when I was shooting overseas with my FZ20 which has a 2.8 > >>constant aperture lens throughout the"superzoom" range, the 2.8 > >>aperture just wasn't enough. The camera does not have RAW, > >>regrettably, and I find I cannot manipulate exposure the way I can in > >>RAW. The camera does have TIFF,however, and I wonder if I could do any > >>more with TIFF as regards underexposure than I can with JPEG. In other > >>words, my impression is that TIFF was rather like JPEG when it comes > >>to manipulation. Am I right or is there more leeway?- Bests vroger > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Leica Users Group. > >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >