Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some advice please
From: phamard at numericable.fr (Philippe Amard)
Date: Sun Nov 25 21:56:15 2007
References: <f2f825f20711251411w73b8fdbajb97a9da94577facb@mail.gmail.com> <6b9bd80a0711251434t41761dc5y73e231f130ae9eca@mail.gmail.com>

I find TIFF to be a little easier to work on than JPEG, but it is only 
my feeling.
BTW TIIF is what I used when I export from LRoom into PS. and it works 
fine then.
Phil...x


Gerry Walden wrote:

>I am afraid that you are right and you are stuck with what you get.
>
>Gerry
>
>On 25/11/2007, Victor Rubin <vroger@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi All:
>>Well, I've finally started shooting RAW and I love it. I did find,
>>however, when I was shooting overseas with my FZ20 which has a 2.8
>>constant aperture lens throughout the"superzoom" range, the 2.8
>>aperture just wasn't enough. The camera does not have RAW,
>>regrettably, and I find I cannot manipulate exposure the way I can in
>>RAW. The camera does have TIFF,however, and I wonder if I could do any
>>more with TIFF as regards underexposure than I can with JPEG. In other
>>words, my impression is that TIFF was rather like JPEG when it comes
>>to manipulation. Am I right or is there more leeway?- Bests vroger
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Some advice please)
In reply to: Message from vroger at gmail.com (Victor Rubin) ([Leica] Some advice please)
Message from gwpics at googlemail.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Some advice please)