Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin@afirkin.com)
Date: Sun Nov 4 01:15:53 2007

It went over my head, and I own one ;-) 

--- richard-lists@imagecraft.com wrote:

From: Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>,        Leica Users Group 
<lug@leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:45:39 -0800

Wide Angle Tri-Elmar, what else can this stand for?

Wookie Angular Toothless Elf?

How about what lens that can possibly have a 16mm in it? You have 16 
Zeiss, 16 Hologon, and.... WATE. There you go.


At 05:31 PM 11/3/2007, Mark Rabiner wrote:

>Its so cool that you guys know what WATE means. I wonder who else does?
>

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com) 


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)